Indus Valley Civilization is No. 1 And The Most civilised Civilization

Indus Valley Civilization

Harappan Civilization

The Indus Valley Civilization, thriving from 3300 to 1300 BCE in South Asia, was an advanced urban society with sophisticated city planning, standardized weights, and a script that remains undeciphered. Flourishing along the Indus River, it featured cities like Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa, showcasing remarkable achievements in trade, art, and technology.

❖ Excavations took place in 1973-1980 at Mehrgarh led by Jean Francois and Richard Meadow.

❖ Common flow of information, culture, customs from Mehrgarh to other places led to uniformity in the Harappan civilizations.

❖ During excavations, in Mehrgarh(which is an important part of Indus Valley Civilization),a series of occupationswas found, which spread to other parts of Cholistan. For example, if we find the best type of pottery in the mature stage, therefore the introduction of pottery must have been in an early stage.

Hence, as we move ahead, the quality of the product should also improve.

❖ In the same way, the products found in the early stages of Indus Valley were not of very fine quality as compared to the products found in the later stages. This means that the quality of the products improved generation by generation.

❖ This is why this triangle was having a lot of commonality in their styles/design/ cultural template.

Phases of Indus Valley Civilization

Early/Pre Harappan-Phase (2700 – 2500 BCE)- Regionalisation Phase

❖ It was the beginning phase and had proto-urban features.

EARLY PHASE OF INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION

❖ Initially, the early stage had small cities which later grew to big cities in the mature stage.

❖ [In order to have big cities, there is a prerequisite of trade which can befulfilled by the road network, connected market and fine quality of product which can be sold. This developed in the later phases]

Features of Early Phase

❖ Introduction of Fortification in order to provide protection from the outsiders.

❖ Improvisation of products in the early stage gave rise to fine quality products in the mature stage.

❖ Good expertise in craft making, stone working, bead making and metal crafting, but not like the mature phase.

❖ Use of wheeled transport and existence of trade networks.

❖ Not large cities like the Mature Harappan phase.

❖ Most raw materials except Jade are similar to the mature Harappan phase.

❖ This civilization flourished in the river basins of the Ghaggar-Hakra River and the Indus river.

❖ This phase is also known as the Hakra Phase of Settlements.

Important Sites:

➢ Balakot, Amri, Kot Diji, Gumla in Pakistan.

➢ Harappa in West Punjab (Now in Pakistan)

➢ Padri in Gujarat

➢ Dholavira in Kutch.

➢ Kalibangan in Rajasthan

❖ Kot Diji represents the phase leading up to the Mature Harappan Phase.

Ghaggar-Hakra Plains:

❖ It was flowed by an intermittent and endorheic river, i.e. Ghaggar-Hakra River. It flows only during the monsoon season.

❖ Ghaggar before the Ottu barrage and as the Hakra downstream of the barrage.

Ghaggar-Hakra might be the mythological Sarasvati River of the Rig Veda.

Mature Harappan Phase (2500 – 2000 BCE)- Integration Phase

Mature Harappan Phase of Indus Valley Civilization lies between 2500-2000BCE.

❖ By 2500 BC, the Indus Valley Civilization had entered into a mature stage.

MATURE PHASE OF INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION

❖ It was a full-fledged urban civilization.

❖ This was a phase of specialization.

❖ Presence of typical black and red pottery

❖ Terracotta figurines were discovered.

❖ Standardized brick size in 1:2:4 ratio, etc.

Important Sites:

➢ Harappa

➢ Mohenjodaro

➢ Lothal

➢ Kalibangan

➢ Dholavira

➢ Banawali

➢ Rakhigarhi

➢ Suktagendor

➢ Shortughai (Afghanistan)

Harappa

Location: Montgomery district of Punjab (now in Pakistan).

Banks of River: Ravi

Excavator: Daya Ram Sahni (1921)

Important Discoveries:

➢ Two Rows of six Granaries: It signifies storage of food, agriculture surplus which is required for urbanized culture

➢ Brick Platforms for Agricultural Processing.

Citadel: which signifies fortification, to control better, segregating rich from poor people.

Single-Room Barracks: Supposed to be occupied by Labour.

➢ Evidence of direct trade interaction with Mesopotamia.

➢ Post-cremation burials are more numerous.

➢ Working floors

➢ Dice

➢ Toys

➢ Sculpture

Mohenjo-Daro (‘Mount of the Dead’)

Location: Pakistan (Sind)

River: Indus

Excavator: R.D. Banerji (1922), E. Mackay, Kashinath Dixit, Sir John Marshall (1930)

Important Discoveries:

➢ It was a much bigger site than Harappa.

➢ Multi-pillared assembly hall.

➢ Great bath (a public venue)

➢ College of priests

➢ Large granary

➢ Piece of woven cotton cloth

➢ Illustrious town planning in a grid structure where roads and avenues meet at a right angle ➢ Great Bath: big swimming pool

➢ Bronze dancing girl

➢ Violent death of some inhabitants (discovery of human skeletons together)

➢ Seal representing Mother Goddess, Pasupathi, bearded man and a woman to be sacrificed.

➢ Evidence of ship/big boat.

➢ Bangles of clay

➢ Brick kilns

➢ Seals of steatite

➢ Bull seal

➢ Mesopotamian cylindrical seal

➢ Terracotta toys

River Indus (flooded 9 times) model city of IVC

❖ Magnificent town planning.

❖ It was the most populated

❖ It is given recognition by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site and funds are provided for its preservation.

Fortified Citadels: The town was divided into upper and lower towns with a distinctive citadel giving evidence for a place of residence for nobility. Such citadel can be seen in Harappa, Mohenjodaro, Kalibangan, etc.

In News:

Chanhu-Daro

Location: Pakistan (Sindh) near Mohenjo-Daro

River: Indus River

Excavator: N.G. Mazumdar (1931) and E. Mckay.

Discoveries:

➢ Bead factory: This signifies that ornamentation was very important and there was mass production. Another bead factory was at Lothal.

➢ No fortified structure

➢ Only Harappan city without a citadel.

➢ Evidence of human sacrifice

➢ Clay model of four-wheeler

➢ Bronze model of roofed chariot.

➢ Only stones and no bricks were used.

Inkpot: Signifies that there was writing.

Lipstick: It signifies that there existed some kind of fashion.

➢ Terracotta model of bullock cart

➢ Bronze toy cart

➢ Remains of both pre-Harappan and Mature Harappan culture.

Kalibangan (‘Black Bangles‘)

Location: Rajasthan (Ganganagar) near Ghaggar river

Ploughed field: Biggest cultivated land in entire pre-historic period, deep furrowed field. No discovery of plough, only grooves were discovered.

 Chalcolithic was neither having plough nor hoe.

 Fire altars showing practice of cult of sacrifice.

 Remains of massive brick walls around both citadel and lower town.

 Bones of camels.

 Not as well-planned and organized as Mohenjo-Daro. It did not even have a drainage system.

 Burials in circular and rectangular graves are sometimes brick chambered.

 Bangles and beads were also found.

 Paved floors (Tiles to lay down smooth floor)

 Provides evidence of pre-Harappan civilisation at the lower layer of excavation and mature Harappan. at the upper layer of excavation.

Surkotada

Location: Bhuj, Gujarat.

Discovered by J.P. Joshi in 1964.

Discoveries:

 Bones of horses*(Debatable)

 Oval graves

 May be active in trade.

Dholavira

Bank of River: Luni

Excavated by: J.P. Joshi in 1990-91.

Discovery:

 Giant water reservoir.

 Unique water harvesting system.

 Inscription/signboard.

 Diagram of a chariot drawn by a naked human pulled by a pair of bullocks.

 Town planning

 Gateway Entrance.

 Fortified MiddleTown.

 It had an open space for ceremonies.

 It was divided into three parts.

 It was surrounded by massive stone walls.

UNESCO World Heritage Site (included in 2021)

 The ancient city of Dholavira is one of the most remarkable and well-preserved urban settlements in South Asia dating from the 3rd to mid-2nd millennium BCE.

 Discovered in 1968, the site is set apart by its unique characteristics, such as its water management system, multi-layered defensive mechanisms, extensive use of stone in construction and special burial structures.

 Of note is also the art associated with the city – artefacts of various kinds such as copper, shell, stone, jewellery of semi-precious stones, terracotta, gold, ivory have been found at the site.

 In addition, the interregional trade links associated with Dholavira, have also been acknowledged as contributing to the shared heritage of humanity.

Lothal

Location: Gujarat (Ahmedabad District, at the head of Gulf of Cambay)

River: Bhogava and Sabarmati river confluence

Excavator: S.R. Rao (1957)

Discovery:

 Dockyard

 Well-planned wall city

 Centre of sea trade

 Important sea trade centre

 Bead-making factory

 Six sectors and each section was built on a wide platform of bricks

 Houses with entrances on the main street

 Rice husks

 Cunning fox

 Double burial male + female

 Seal from Mesopotamia

 Ivory scale

 Fire altar (was also found in Kalibangan)

 Terracotta model of ship

Rangpur, Gujarat (near Lothal)

River: Madar river

Excavator: M.S. Vats (1931), S.R. Rao (1953-1954)

Discovery:

 Remains of both pre-Harappan and Mature Harappan culture

 Flakes

 Yellow and gray color pots of pre-Harappan people.

Banawali

Location: Hissar, Haryana

River: Rangoi

Excavator: R.S. Bist (1973-1974)

Discovery:

 Centre of pre-Harappan, Mature Harappan as well as Late Harappan civilisation.

 High quality barley

 Ceramics, steatite seal

 Fire altars

 Clay model of plough

 Seals, found only in lower town and not in citadel

Alamgirpur

Location: Meerut (Uttar Pradesh)

River: Hindon River

Excavator: Y.D. Sharma (1958)

Discovery:

 Late-Harappan culture

 Impression of cloth on a trough

 Pottery and beads

Koti-Diji

Location: Sindh (Pakistan)

River: Sindh river

Excavator: Ghurey (1835), Fazal Ahmed (1955)

Discovery:

 Pre-Harappan site

 House made of stone

 City destroyed by force

Amri Sindh

River: Sindh River

Excavator: Ghurey (1835) Fazal Ahmed (1955)

Discovery:

Remains of rhinoceros

Ropar

Location: Punjab, India.

River: Sutlej river

Excavator: By Y.D. Sharma (1955-1956)

Discovery:

 Cemetery.

 Seal earthen pot.

 Buildings mainly of stone and soil.

 Evidence of burying the dog below the human.

Suktagendor

Location: Balochistan, Sindh (Pakistan)

River: Dasht/ Dashak river

Excavator: A Stein, George Dales

Discovery:

 Ash filled pot

 Copper axe

 Earthen bangles and pottery

 Originally a port but later cut off from sea due to coastal uplift

 Had trade links with Babylon.

Rakhigarhi

Location: Near Hisar, Haryana

Largest Indus valley Civilisation site

 Shows all three phases of IVC.

World’s largest museum of Harappan culture to set up in Haryana’s Rakhigarhi village.

Bhirrana (Fatehgarh)

 A fragmented artefact of a thick

 Sturdy red ware with an incised female figure – ‘dancing girl‘ has been discovered.

Important Facts:

 Largest IVC site is Rakhigarhi located in Haryana (350 hectares)

 Mohenjo-Daro (approx 200 hectares)

 Harappa (approx 150 hectares)

 Dholavira (approx 100 hectares)

 Ganweriwala (approx 80 hectares)

Additional Information:

 More than 1500 sites (including Pre-Harappan, Early-Harappan, Mature-Harappan and Late- Harappan) covering the Harappan realm has been classified into three categories

i.e. Villages or hamlets: Area < 10 hectares

Towns: Area 10-50 hectares

Metropolis cities area: Area > 50 hectares [only 5]

Large cemetery in Juna Khatiya village, Gujarat’s Kutch district:

 A Harappan graveyard [Necropolis] Cemetery spread over 16 hectares, considered to be the largest pre-urban Harappan cemetery. found rows of (500) graves with pottery beads, skeletal remains, ceramic pots, plates and vases, beaded jewellery, and animal bones dates back to 2,850 BC.

 They are still trying to determine if the cemetery served a big human settlement in the vicinity or if it was a common fality for a cluster of smaller settlements.

 The digging began in 2019 at Juna Khatiya village.

 The cemetery is believed to be the largest of its kind and raises questions out the nature of the settlements it served.

 The pottery found at the site matches the pre-urban Harappan pottery of Sindh, Balochistan, and North Gujarat.

 The acidic soil in Khatiya makes it challenging to extract DNA samples from the excavated remains.

 The distance between Khatiya and Dholavira suggests that the people buried in Khatiya were not from the urban settlements of Dholavira

 The researchers speculate that Khatiya could have been a big settlement itself or a common burial ground for smaller settlements in the vicinity.

Next to explore a new site called Padada Bhit, located about 1.5 km from the cemetery, which they believe could be related.

 Lakhapar, a nearby village, is also identified as a potential source of clues

Urban Culture

Features:

 Magnificent town planning.

 Homogenisation: Raised part (Citadel) with fortifications.

 Presence of Roads and Sanitation.

 Covered Drainage system with instructions.

 Every house was connected to the drainage system.

 Dedicated space for dumping the garbage.

 Watch and ward system was present.

 Public wells or personal wells were present.

 Discovery of Double-storied houses, burnt-bricks, bathroom, a kitchen and a well Public Buildings in the Citadel

 Presence of Great Bath, Granaries and Assembly Halls.

Villages to Cities

 Cities grew out of earlier villages

 Before 2600 B.C. sites like Harappa, Dholavira, Rakhigarhi, Banawali, Kalibangan, Rehman Dheri, Nausharo, Kot Diji and many more existed in the form of rural Harappan settlements.

Town Planning

City divided into two parts:

 Citadel (Upper Part/Raised Part), with fortification (generally in the western direction), on the raised platform.

 Lower Part (working class quarters).

 After the lower town, at some distance, there was riverine.

Presence of Grid plan: It followed in arrangement of houses and roads and lanes cutting across one another almost at right angles thus dividing the city into several rectangular blocks.

Roads/Streets wide

 Intersected at right angles.

 Main street was 10 m wide

 Lamp-posts were present.

 Corners were rounded.

 Cardinal orientation.

Bricks

 Usage of Burnt bricks.

 Identical ratio of bricks: 1:2:4 [thickness:width:length].

 Uniformity in size of bricks Houses: 7 x 14 x 28 cm.

City walls: 10 x 20 x 40 Interlocking pattern.

 It shows that there is some kind of common planning which is ensuring that the same types of bricks should be created in order to maintain uniformity in the whole Indus Valley Civilization.

 In Egypt, dry bricks were used (shows that we were much more advanced than Egypt).

 In Mesopotamia, burnt bricks were used at a much smaller scale.

Drainage System

 Drains were covered.

 Usage of bricks or stone slabs.

 Inspection holes/Manholes were present (which could be removed for cleaning).

 Gentle slope connected to house drains. Drains were made of mortar, lime and gypsum.

Houses

 Presence of two or more storeys. Staircases were tiled.

 Bathrooms were connected to common drainage.

 Presence of personal wells

 No window faced the streets (indicated privacy)

 Houses were 1/2 storey high.

 Rooms were around the courtyard.

 Main door did not open on the main street.

 Rooms had paved floors.

 Roofs were made of mud, reed and wood.

 Presence of watch and ward arrangement.

 Presence of specific places to throw rubbish and waste materials.

 Public wells were present in every street.

Pottery kilns were not allowed within the town.

Some barrack-like groups of single roomed tenements at Mohenjo-daro and Harappa were similar to the coolie lines of Indian tea and other estates.

Some big houses whereas other small ones show some kind of social inequality.

Public Buildings

 A high pillared hall area 80 sq. ft Assembly hall

Great Bath:

 It is made up of a big quadrangle.

 It was a huge rectangular tank probably used for special rites or ceremonial bathing and resembled a modern-day swimming pool.

 Large swimming pool in the centre (39 feet long, 23 feet wide, and 8 feet deep).

 It features a flight of stairs at either end and is supplied by a well.

 180 ft X 180 ft sq.

 Bricked lining

 It was Plastered

 Bricks 20 in. X 8 in. & 9 X 4

 It was water tight with tar to prevent water leakage

 There was a system of inlet/outlet of water

 It was surrounded by rooms

 Presence of flight of steps

 It was fed by a well situated adjoining room

Great Granary

 The largest building at Mohenjodaro is the granary, which measures 45.71 metres in length and 15.23 metres in width.

Two rows of six granaries each were built on a set of brick platforms that were present in Harappa.

 Also, brick platforms have been found in Kalibangan’s southern region.

 27 blocks of brick-work crisscrossed by narrow ventilation channels.

 200 ft X 150 ft

 Further subdivided into smaller storage blocks.

Granary at Harappa

6 Granaries.

 Smaller and measure 15m X 6m

Working floors:rows of circular brick platforms arranged in rows.

 Used for threshing grains.

 A two-room barrack.

Cultural Template

 Whole civilization was having an affinity towards squares which can be seen in IVC architecture.

Agriculture

 It was the main occupation in rural areas.

 In Ancient times, more fertile, more natural vegetation attracted more rainfall.

 Currently rainless and not so fertile, but the production was good enough for survival based on the temporary arrangements made.For example, cultivation of crops near the riverine bed region during non-rainfall months of the year.

 Annual inundation in Indus water. It had more alluvial silt than the Nile river in Egypt.

Technique of Agriculture:

 Sowing and Reaping: In November sow seeds of wheat and Barley. Reaping during the month of April.

 No clear evidence of the tools.

 Furrows or plough-marks at Kalibangan, Terracotta models at Banawali and Bahawalpur (probably wooden plough) were discovered

 Stone sickles used for harvesting.

Types of Crops grown:

 Wheat, barley [2 qualities]

 Rai, Peas, sesamum, mustard, Jujube, etc

 Rice (summer crop) evidence at Lothal and Rangpur (in the form of husks embedded in pottery)

 Watermelon, dates, millets, grapes, henna (mehndi), garlic, mustard

 Earliest to produce Cotton (Since cotton was first produced in this area, the Greeks called it Sindon).

Cotton:

 Grown at Mehrgarh in 5000 BC

 Cloth were found attached to silver vase at Mohenjo Daro

 Spindle whorls of terracotta and faience

Irrigation:

 Gabarbands or nalas enclosed by dams (Afghanistan and Balochistan).

 However, the channel or canal irrigation system was absent in general.

Exception: Only Dholavira, which had a canal system.

Livestock

 They domesticated Oxen, Buffalo, Goats, Sheep, Pigs, and Humped bull.

 There were signs of the feet of Dogs and Cats.

 Camels -beasts of burden.

 Society was definitely not horse-centered.

 No bones and no representation

 Elephants and Rhinoceros were known to Harappans.

 In Gujarat, domesticated Elephants

 The contemporary Mesopotamian cities domesticated all the animals as Harappan except Elephants.

Relished non-vegetarian food: exploited riverine and marine resources.

Fish eating, molluscs: protein-rich food in the coastal sites of Gujarat.

 Consumed milk and curd.

Metal and Related crafts

 Aware of almost all the metals except iron.

 Bronze was produced from copper and tin. Dancing girl made of bronze was discovered.

Copper tools and weapons:

 A number of copper tools and weapons have also been discovered.

 The common tools included axe, saws, chisels, knives, spearheads and arrowheads.

 The Harappan people produced weapons made of various metals.However, it is important to note that the weapons produced by the Harappans were mostly defensive in nature as there is no evidence of weapons like swords, etc.

 Stone tools were also commonly used.

Gold and silver object

 The gold objects include beads, armlets, needles and other ornaments/jewellery.

 Use of silver was more common than gold.

 A large number of silver ornaments, dishes, etc. have been discovered.

 Harappans may have obtained Gold and Silver from Afghanistan.

 Harappans imported other precious metal from South India.

 There is also ample evidence of the use of the bronze though in limited manner.

 Tin and copper were not easily available.

 Copper was obtained from Khetri mines, Rajasthan.

 Tin was obtained from Afghanistan.

Product [Industries and Crafts]

 Bronze

 Copper tools & weapons

 Gold & objects/Jewellery

 Beads & Ornaments

 Pottery

 Cotton and wool clothes

 Boat

 Carts

 Bangles

Bead Making

 Beads were made of precious and semi-precious stones such as agate and Carnelian shell, jasper, crystal, steatite.

 Gold and silver beads have also been found.

 Cut shaped polished bored.

 Ivory carving and inlaying used in beads, bracelets and other decorations were also in practice.

 The evidence of beadmakers’ shops has been found at Chanhudaro and Lothal.

Terracotta figurines of males and females

The female figurines were more in comparison to that of males

 Worship of mother goddess.

 Variety of models of birds, monkeys, dogs, sheep, cattle, humped and humpless bulls + toy carts are found.

 Various models of terracotta carts were discovered.

Black on Red Pottery

 Pottery making was also an important industry in the Harappan period.

 Harappans were excellent potters, they developed specialization in pottery making.

 Chiefly wheels were made and were treated with a red coating and had decorations in black.

 These are found in various sizes and shapes.

The painted designs consist of horizontal lines of varied thickness:

 Leaf patterns, palms and pipal trees.

 Birds, fishes and animals are also depicted on pottery.

 Various types of utensils, toys, seals, figurines have been excavated from different sites.

Example: Painted earthen jars, Beads and Ornaments, Toy Animal with moveable head

Clothes

 The recovery of woven cotton from Mohenjo Daro and textile impressions found on several objects shows the prevalence of spinning and weaving industries.

 Clothes of both wool and cotton were woven.

Boat-Making:

 Harappans also practiced boat-making. They carried navigation on the coast of the Arabian Sea.

Carts with Solid Wheels

 They also made carts with solid wheels.

 They used some kind of modern Ekka but not a spoked wheel.

Note:The concept of making wheels might have come from pottery.

Weights and Measures

 It had standardization and accuracy in the context of weights and measures.

 They followed a binary system in the lower denominations: 1,2,8,16,32 to 64, and then in decimal multiples of 160 like 160,320,640,1600,3200 and so on.

 Weights were made of chert, limestone and steatite and were generally cubical in shape.

Scales

 Measures of length were based on the foot (37.6 cm) and the cubit (51.8 to 53.3 cm).

 A shell scale has been found at Mohenjo Daro, a shell object probably used to measure the angles has been found at Saurashtra.

 An ivory scale has been discovered at Lothal.

Seals and Other Enablers

Money:No metallic money in circulation.There was a prevalence of the Barter system.

Transport: Primarily bullock carts and Boats.

Ports:

 A dockyard has been excavated in Lothal.

 Sea ports have been found at Rangpur, Somnath and Balakot.

Seals

Scripts Seals:

❖ Most of the urban Harappan sites have reported seals/ distinctive traits of the mature phase.

❖ Thousands of seals have been discovered.

Materials: Steatite, and occasionally of agate, chert, copper, faience and terracotta. Some are found in gold and ivory.

Depiction: Beautiful figures of animals and also monsters, Unicorns, bull, rhinoceros, tiger, elephant, bison, goat, buffalo, etc. The realistic rendering of these animals in various forms is remarkable. Sometimes trees or human figures were also depicted.

Shape:

➢ Generally, they are square/rectangular. Some are circular and few are cylindrical.

➢ The standard Harappan seal was a square plaque 2 X 2 square inches, usually made from the soft river stone, steatite.

Purpose: Mainly commercial. Also used as amulets(carried on the persons of their owners, perhaps as modern-day identity cards).

❖ Every seal is engraved in a pictographic script which is yet to be deciphered.

Pashupati Seal

❖ The most remarkable seal is the one depicted with a figure in the center and animals around.

❖ It was discovered at Mohenjo Daro.

❖ This seal is generally identified as the Pashupati Seal by some scholars whereas some identify it as the female deity.

❖ This seal depicts a figure of a Yogi seated cross-legged.

❖ Most of these seals have a knob at the back through which runs a hole and it is believed that they were used by different guilds of merchants and traders for stamping purposes.

❖ When not in use, they could be worn round the neck or the arm like an amulet.

❖ Presence of these seals, especially the cylindrical ones often with Harappan motifs suggest a cultural interaction with Mesopotamian and Persian world whereas the circular ones are similar to that of the Gulf area.

❖ Amongst the variety of subjects depicted on the seals, it was the so-called ‘Unicorn’ (one horned mythical animal) that outnumbered the rest.

Other animals incorporated are:

➢ Short horned bull (bison)

➢ Brahmani bull with its characteristic’s dewlap and hump.

➢ Buffalo

➢ Rhinoceros

➢ Tiger

➢ Elephant

➢ Crocodile

➢ Antelope

➢ Goat

➢ Hare

❖ Then there were composite animals and even human and animal combinations.

❖ Some seals contain more complex monographic scenes representing mythological or religious depiction.

❖ It is noteworthy that while the seals depict a number of animals there is no representation of horses on these. It has led many scholars to argue that horse was not known to the Harappan people though there are others who do not accept this argument.

❖ Thus now, Harappan seals are treated more in the nature of token of power and prestige rather than merebadges bearing their owner’s name.

❖ If the function of these seals, in which they were supposed to perform, was simply restricted to vouching for merchants right on the goods they were stamped on a lump of clay of a sealed container, there is no reason why so much artistic skill went into their manufacture.

Trade Of INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION

❖ Indus valley people had both short and long-distance trade, and also foreign trade.

International Trade with: Mesopotamia, Gulf countries, Afghanistan, Central Asia, Iran.

❖ The thriving agricultural economy supported a flourishing trade both within the northern and western areas of the sub-continent and between the people of this culture and those of the Persian and Gulf and Mesopotamia.

❖ The products of Indus have been found in Mesopotamia.

❖ They used boats and bullock-carts for transportation.

❖ Developed a uniform system of weights and measures.

❖ Seals and sealings were used in trade, as marks of ownership meant to guarantee the Quality of the product.

❖ There were bead-making factories at Chanhudaro and Lothal. The products of these factories were items of export.

❖ Writing or scripts although not deciphered till date, but it also facilitated trades.

❖ The findings of Indus seals suggest that merchants from Indus actually resided in Mesopotamia.

❖ Shortughai was a Harappan trading post in Afghanistan.

❖ The Mesopotamian records from about 2350 BC refer to trade relations with Meluha, which was the ancient name given to the Indus region.

Exported materials: Wheat, Barley, Pottery, Oilseeds, Peas, Cotton, Beads, Terracotta figures, Ivory products, etc.

Harappan Trade with Mesopotamia:

❖ Engaged in trade with Mesopotamia largely through Oman and Bahrain in the Persian Gulf.

❖ Presence of Harappan artifacts such as beads, seals, dice, etc. in these regions.

❖ Cities like Susa, Ur, etc. yielded about two dozen Harappan seals and potteries, etched carnelian beads and dices.

❖ Artifacts from those regions are rarely found at the Harappan sites. A seal of West Asian or Persian origin has been discovered at Lothal.

❖ Inscriptional evidence from Mesopotamia refers to trade with Dilmun, Magan and Meluhha.

➢ Meluhha with Harappan region.

➢ Magan with Makran coast.

➢ Dilmun with Bahrain.

❖ Mesopotamian imports: Copper, carnelian, ivory, shell, lapis lazuli, pearls and ebony from Meluhha.

Mesopotamian exports to Harappans: Garments, wool, perfumes, leather products and silver.

❖ Commercial relations with Afghanistan and Iran.

❖ Trading colony in Northern Afghanistan which facilitated trade with Central Asia (Shortughai) Major Imported Materials by the Harappans

Material Source

Gold

❖ Afghanistan

❖ Persia

❖ Karnataka(Kolar)

Silver

❖ Jwar mines of Rajasthan

❖ Iran Copper

❖ Balochistan, Oman and Khetri (Rajasthan)

Tin

❖ Afghanistan

❖ Central Asia

❖ Carnelian beads

❖ Gujarat and Sindh

❖ Agates

❖ Western India

Lead

❖ Rajasthan

❖ South India

❖ Afghanistan

❖ Iran

Coins

❖ Copper seals from Lothal and Desalpur

❖ Jade and Turquoise

❖ Pamir, Khorasan (Central Asia)

❖ Iran

Lapis-lazuli

❖ Kashmir and Shortughai (Afghanistan)

Steatite

❖ Tapi Chahya(Iran),South Rajasthan

❖ Bitumen

❖ Balochistan,Mesopotamia

Political System

There are three major theories:

Single state: similarity in artefacts, the evidence for planned settlements, the standardised ratio of brick size, and the establishment of settlements near sources of raw material.

➢ No single ruler but several: Mohenjo-Daro had a separate ruler, Harappa another, and so forth.

➢ No rulers, and everybody enjoyed equal status.

❖ It is not clear what type of political system existed in Harappa.

❖ But we can see the cultural homogenisation which indicates probably there was a Centralised Authority, for instance there might be an oligarchy type political set up.

Not ruled by priests as the cities in lower Mesopotamia, in contrast to Egypt and Mesopotamia, don’t have evidence of temples.

❖ People of Indus Valley Civilizations were more concerned with commerce than with conquests.

❖ There was no significant presence of weapons at any site.

❖ So, from the above-mentioned information we can conclude that Harappa was possibly ruled by a class of merchants (Oligarchy)

Existence of State

State Existed State did Not Exist

❖ Communication system

❖ Standardisation in artefacts

❖ Site specialisation

❖ Mobilisation of labour for public works

❖ Establishment of trading outpost at Shortughai

❖ Cultural uniformity does not mean political unification.

❖ Elements of warfare/conflicts do not dominate.

Exception: Fortification especially at Dholavira.

❖ Common script

❖ Cultural homogeneity

❖ Social differentiation

❖ Some buildings of citadel complex may have admin functions

❖ Absence of evidence of priest king, slaves,standing army or court officials.

❖ Equality with respect to access to wealth.

❖ Absence of marked economic difference as compared to Mesopotamia or Egypt.

NOTE: They showed greater acceptance towards the possibility of decentralisation.

Sculptures

❖ Very few sculptures are known for their high standard of craftsmanship.

❖ In comparison with Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations, IVC reported a very limited number of stone and bronze sculptures depicting basically human and animal forms.

❖ The major specimens are reported from Mohenjo-Daro and few from Harappa, Chanhudaro, Dholavira and Daimabad.

❖ Of these, except the statue of ‘Dancing Girl’ from Mohenjo-Daro and Daimabad, hoards representing various animals were casted in bronze rest were carved in stone, dominated by male figures.

Major Findings with respect to Sculptures

Priest King:- Stone bust of male figure found at Mohenjo Daro.

❖ 2 fine stone torsos of male figures at Harappa.

❖ A seated stone ibex at mohenjo Daro.

❖ Stone lizard at Dholavira.

❖ Broken seated male figure at Dholavira.

❖ 2 bronze female figurines were found at Mohenjodaro (1 among these two is dancing girl)

Priest-King:

❖ Found at Mohen-jo-Daro.

❖ It was a steatite sculpture.

❖ He may be a person of very high rank.

❖ In the sculpture he has elaborate clothing and ornaments.

❖ His body below the chest is missing.

Dimensions: Height of 17.5 cm and width of 11 cm.

❖ He has well-combed hair.

❖ The hair parted in the middle and dropped behind the neck.

❖ Nude figure of this youth with well-built yet supple and sensuous body.

❖ It had holes for the attachment of the heads and arms, but none were apparent for the legs.

Dancing Girl:

❖ A bronze statue of nude Dancing Girl found in Mohen-jo-Daro. (It was named by John Marshall)

❖ It was made with a lost wax method/Cire-Perdue.

❖ The statue of about 11 cm. in height

Lost-wax Technique

❖ The lost-wax process, also known as cire-perdue, is a metal casting technique in which molten metal is poured into a mould that was made using a wax model.

❖ The wax model is melted and drained away after the mould has been created.

❖ Molten metal is poured into a hollow core, which is then solidified to produce the casting.

Artistic Style

❖ The stylistic tradition was not homogeneous and uniform.

❖ There was a difference in composition, form and technique between the‘Priest- King’ and ‘Dancing girl‘ found in Mohen-jo-Daro.

➢ The quantity or quality of the Harappan sculptural remains cannot be compared with the repertoire of either Mesopotamia or Egypt.

➢ Neither we find a variety of expression nor the range of exploitation of media which both these cultures witnessed.

❖ However, an assortment of Harappan sculptures reflects on their own developed art concept.

❖ It was surprising to not have sculptural remains of animals but represented in the seals, terracotta and pottery drawings.

❖ Few animals found depicted in copper or bronze, gold or silver and stoneor faience are in the form of miniature figurines mostly as ornaments, forming a part of necklace representing sheep, rabbit, monkey, buffalo, squirrel, bull etc., nevertheless, these representations cannot be treated as sculptures. ❖ Hoard from Daimabad which was discovered accidentally consists of four animal sculptures.

❖ In Late Harappan period we found:

➢ A pair of oxen, an elephant, a rhinoceros and a buffalo.

➢ Solid casts weigh over 60 kg.

➢ Of these, the chariot and bulls are remarkable.

Society

❖ Society appeared to have been matriarchal in nature.

❖ The prevalence of the mother goddess – terracotta female figurines in Punjab and Sind Region.

❖ The existence of diverse professions – priests, warriors, peasants, traders and artisans (masons, weavers, gold-smith, potters, etc.)

➢ Harappa and Lothal had different types of buildings as residence by different classes.

➢ The presence of a class of workmen is proved by workmen quarters near the granary at Harappa.

❖ Workshops and houses meant for coppersmiths and bead-makers were found at Lothal.

❖ Larger houses belonged to the rich class whereas those living in the barracks like workmen quarters were from the class of labourers.

Fashion

❖ They used to wear both cotton and woolen clothes indicating their consciousness of fashion.

❖ Men and women wore two separate pieces of attire similar to the dhoti and shawl.

➢ Shawl covered the left shoulder passing below the right shoulder.

➢ Skirt like a dress to cover the lower portion.

❖ Different hairstyles were in vogue – both sexes

❖ Wearing of a beard was evident among the males.

❖ Cinnabar is probably used for cosmetic purposes.

❖ Apart from these face-paint, lipstick and collyrium (eyeliner) have also been found.

❖ They were fond of Jewellery and ornaments (beads etc.)

❖ Ornaments like Necklaces, armlets, earrings, beads, bangles, etc., used by both the sexes.

❖ Rich people used gold, silver and semi-precious stones.

❖ Poor used wear ornaments made of terracotta.

❖ Export and Import product of Clothing: Discovery of a large number of spindles and spindle whorls and spinning of cotton was very common, hence this indicates they probably do internal and external trade with these products as well.

❖ Both the rich and the poor practiced spinning whorls made by expensive faience as also of the cheap pottery and shell.

❖ A recent study conducted by the University of Cambridge and Banaras Hindu University has found evidence of animal products, including cattle and buffalo meat, in ceramic vessels dating back approximately 4,600 years at seven Indus Valley Civilisation sites in present-day Haryana and Uttar Pradesh.

❖ The study analyzed lipid residue in pottery to determine the presence of these animal products.

❖ The research suggests that beef consumption was prevalent among the Indus populations, with a cultural preference for beef supplemented by the consumption of cattle and buffalo meat.

❖ The study also revealed a dominance of animal products in the vessels, including non-ruminant animal meat, ruminant animal meat, and dairy products.

❖ This investigation into lipid residues in pottery from multiple sites provides valuable insights into the dietary practices of the Indus Valley Civilisation.

❖ While the study found limited evidence of dairy products, regional differences may exist, as a separate study in Gujarat revealed evidence of dairy product consumption.

Religious Belief

❖ Our understanding is majorly based on the Harappan seals and terracotta figurines.

❖ Major interpretation by John Marshall in 1931.

❖ Harappan religion is normally termed as animism i.e., worship of trees, stones, etc.,

❖ Terracotta figurines indicate they probably used to worship the mother goddess.

➢ Female adorned with a wide griddle, loin cloth and necklaces.

➢ Wear a fan-shaped head dress.

❖ In various cases a female is shown with an infant.

❖ One such figurine that shows a plant growing out of the uterus of a woman, probably it symbolises the goddess of earth (prototype of Shakambhari) and it was connected with the origin and growth of plants.

➢ Earth: fertility goddess.

➢ Worshipped her in the same manner as Egyptians worshipped the Nile goddess.

❖ The worshipping of linga (phallus) and yoni (female sex organ) by the Harappans have also been proposed but there is no ample evidence to support these proposals. Even Rigveda speaks of the non-aryan people who were phallus worshippers.

❖ Though recently a terracotta piece is found in Kalibangan which closely resembles a lingam with yoni Pitha.

Male Deity: Evident by the seal depicting a deity with a buffalo- horned headdress, sitting in a yogic posture and surrounded by animals- an elephant, a tiger, a rhinoceros and a buffalo. Two deer are considered sacred. This deity is identified with God Pashupati (Lord of beasts) or ‘Proto-Shiva’‘.

Tree Worship: In other instances, a deity is shown with horns and flowing hair standing nude between the branches of a Pipal tree and a worshipper is kneeling in front. It represents tree worship.

Procession Seal: Horned figures in a pipal tree with one-horned attendants and bull figures. 2000-1900 BCE.

Animal Worship: It also appears to be popular among the Harappans. Many of them have been represented on the seals. The most important one is the One-horned animal unicorn which may be a Rhinoceros.

Fire worship: Fire worship was prevalent in Kalibangan and Lothal.

➢ At Kalibangan, a series of raised brick platforms with pits containing ash and animal bones.

❖ Different areas followed different religious practices.

❖ Gods were not placed in Temples as in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia.

Great Bath: Elite ritual activity involving ceremonial bathing can be found in the Great Bath of Mohenjo-Daro.

Kalibangan Cylindrical Seal: A woman flanked by 2 men holding her with one hand and raised sword over her head may indicate Human sacrifice.

Burial Practices

❖ Not yielded any monument such as the Pyramids of Egypt or the Royal cemetery at Ur in Mesopotamia. Dead bodies were generally resting in a north-south direction.

❖ Buried with a varying number of earthen pots.

❖ In some graves, grave goods found such as bangles, beads, copper mirrors indicate they believed in life after death. But grave goods were not very lavish.

❖ Dead bodies are generally buried in a north-south manner with jewellery and other items as grave goods. E.g., Inamgaon (Maharashtra).

❖ These different practices in different regions of Harappan civilization may reflect diversity in religious beliefs.

Findings of Burials

Harappa: A coffin burial with a shroud (kafan) made of reeds has been found.

❖ At Lothal, multiple or double burials with male and female bodies together were discovered.

❖ Kalibangan has yielded evidence of a symbolic burial along i.e., a burial which contains grave goods but no bones or skeleton.

❖ At Mohenjo Daro and Harappa we also found Fractional burials where bodies exposed to elements and bones were gathered and buried.

❖ Urn burials found at Kalibangan and other IVC sites are indicative of post-cremation burials.

Script

Pictographic and logosyllabic (each symbol stood for a word/syllable).

❖ Probably ideograms i.e., a graphic symbol or a character to convey the idea directly.

❖ Writing was boustrophedon (right to left and left to right in alternate lines).

❖ Script has not been deciphered so far.

❖ The evidence of a common script points to great cultural integration.

❖ Virtual disappearance by c.1700 BCE hints at the lack of sufficient downward percolation of writing.

❖ The Harappans were literate people. Harappan seals are engraved with various signs or characters.

❖ Recent studies revealed that the Harappan script consists of about 400 signs.

❖ The language is still unknown. But little research suggests that their language might be “Brahui“, a dialect used by Baluchi people in Pakistan today.

❖ Unlike Egyptians and Mesopotamians, Harappans did not write long inscriptions.Their most inscriptions were recorded on seals and contained only a few words.

Script in Egypt

❖ An inscribed stone with writing in three different languages and scripts was discovered near Rosetta, an Egyptian town on the north shore

❖ Kings’ and queens’ names were encased in a little frame known as a cartouche.

Script in Mesopotamia

❖ Cuneiform is a logo-syllabic script that was used to write several languages of the Ancient Near East.

❖ It is named for the characteristic wedge-shaped impressions (Latin: cuneus) which form its signs.

❖ Cuneiform was originally developed to write the Sumerian language of southern Mesopotamia.

●Cuneiform is the earliest writing system.

Distinguishing Features of Harappan and Mesopotamian Civilization

Harappan Civilization

❖ Planned towns – chess board system.

❖ Excellent drainage system.

❖ Rectangular houses, brick-lined bathrooms, wells, stairways.

❖ Own unique pottery, seals.

❖ No resemblance to Egyptian/Mesopotamian.

❖ Script mostly on seals.

❖ No signs of existence after 1900 BCE.

❖ Spread over a wider area.

Egypt / Mesopotamian Civilization

❖ Haphazard growth.

❖ No excellent drainage system was found.

❖ No rectangular houses, brick-lined bathrooms, wells,stairways were found.

❖ No Own unique pottery, seals.

❖ Mesopotamia – cuneiform script
❖ Egyptian script – hieroglyphics
❖ Both scripts have been deciphered.

❖ Mesopotamians pressed letters onto moist clay tablets while Egyptians wrote on papyrus sheets made of reeds.

❖ Continued to exist even after 1900 BCE.

❖ Less area as compared to Harappa.

Technology

❖ New techniques in metallurgy and copper, bronze, lead, and tin came to existence.

❖ A touchstone found in Banawali.

❖ No use of iron.

Engineering skill: Especially in building docks. great accuracy in measuring length, mass, and time. weights and measures later used in Kautilya’s Arthashastra (4th century BCE) are similar.

Causes of Decline of Indus Valley Civilization:

Flood Theory:

➢ Tectonic shift at Sewan near Mohenjo Daro.

➢ Alternate: Indus changed its course and started moving some 30 miles away from Mohenjo Daro.

➢ Harappan sites in Ghaggar Hakra valley affected by gradual desiccation. Sedimentation made the river shallow and led to the disappearance of sites close to Ghaggar Hakra.

River Capture: Either Yamuna or Satluj which used to flow via Ghaggar was captured.

Sudden Rise of Arabian Sea Coastline: Floods and rise in soil salinity disrupted coastal commerce and trade.

Aridity and Famine theory:➢ Increased aridity and drying up of the river Ghaggar-Hakra on account of the changes in river courses.

➢ Increase in arid conditions by around 2000 BCE affected agricultural production.

Rainfall: Rainfall in IVC increased around 3000 BCE and then decreased around 2000 BCE. This may haveadversely affected agriculture and stock bearing.

Fertility: Increasing salinity of the soil caused by the expansion of neighboring desert led to a decrease in soil fertility.

Over-exploitation: Overgrazing, over cultivation, excessive cutting of trees for fuel or farming.

Decline in Lapis Lazuli trade with Mesopotamia.

Foreign Invasion:

Aryan Invasion Theory (Ramprasad Chanda 1926/elaborated by Mortimer Wheeler):

➢ IVC was destroyed by the Aryans who came to India from north-west around 1500 BC. [This theory is completely negated today].➢ Evidence in support of the theory (provided by Ramprasad Chandra): ▪ Mention of Indra, considered as the destroyer of Forts.▪ Mention of Hariyupriya (signified Harappa) in Rigveda.

➢ Few signs of insecurity and violence appeared in the last phase of Mohenjodaro.

▪ Hoards of jewellery were buried at places.

▪ Skulls were huddled together in one place.

▪ New types of axes, daggers, knives appeared in the last phase of Mohenjodaro.

➢ But the new people did not come in such a great number as to completely overwhelm IVC.

❖ A recent study conducted by the University of Cambridge suggests that prolonged droughts during the Bronze Age, around 4,200 years ago, played a significant role in the decline of the ancient Indus civilization in present-day Pakistan and India.

❖ The researchers analyzed a stalagmite from a cave in India’s Uttarakhand region to assess rainfall patterns over thousands of years.

❖ They discovered evidence of three droughts lasting 25-90 years each during a 200-year dry period, which coincided with the civilization’s construction of cities.

❖ The droughts had a severe impact on the region, affecting food systems and habitation patterns. As a result, the Indus people were forced to adapt by reorganizing their cities, moving towards smaller rural settlements, and changing their agricultural practices, relying more on drought-resistant crops like millets

❖ Conclusion:

The civilization did not collapse all of a sudden but declined gradually and ultimately merged with other local cultures.

Late Harappan Phase (2000 – 1900 BCE):

❖ It was also called the Localisation Era.

❖ Fragmentation and decline in the cities.

❖ Settlements were smaller in this phase.

❖ But not a sudden change, rather there was a gradual change in seals, pottery confined writing in the frequency of cubical weights and so on.

❖ More in number but smaller in size.

❖ Rural settlement became evident.

Post Urban Phase (1900 BCE – 1300 BCE):

❖ It was the Late Harappan phase after the Mature Harappan phase.

❖ There was a complex interplay of change and continuity.

1. Decline in Urban Settlements:

➢ Decline of urban life.

➢ Stylistic homogeneity of the mature phase disappeared.

➢ Sharp stylistic diversity.

➢ Elements of urbanism like seals, specialised crafts, cities, long distance trade, and so on, declined but did not completely disappear.

2. Rural Lifestyle:

➢ The phase is referred to as sub-Indus culture.

➢ People lived in villages.

➢ Primarily Chalcolithic in nature.

3. Decline in Urban Economy:

❖ No object for measuring length.

❖ Items like lapis lazuli, chert, carnelian beads, copper and bronze vessels are either absent or scarce as trade items.

➢ It means the end of trade with West Asian centers.

➢ Except at Bhagwanpur, Haryana, burnt bricks have not been found anywhere else in late Harappan culture.

4. Pottery:

➢ Painted Harappan pottery is replaced with less intricate designs and Painted Grey Ware (PGW).

➢ Overlaps with PGW in Harayana and Ochre Coloured Pottery (OCP) in Western Uttar Pradesh.

➢ Lack of human figurines, less bright.

➢ The pots were thicker and sturdier.

➢ Mature shapes like perforated jars, s-shaped jars disappeared.

5. Subsistence:

➢ Subsisting on agriculture.

➢ Diversification of agriculture.

➢ Beginning of double cropping:

▪ Wheat and barley were grown as winter crops.

▪ Rice, millets and sorghum were grown as summer crops.

➢ Stock-raising, Hunting and fishing were practiced.

Important Sites of Late Harappan Phase:

❖ Swat Valley

❖ Kudwala in Cholistan

❖ Prabhas Patan (Somnath)

❖ Rangpur (Gujarat)

❖ Bet Dwarka in Gujarat

❖ Daimabad in Maharashtra

❖ Manda in Jammu

❖ Sanghol in Punjab

❖ Daulatpur in Haryana

❖ Alamgirpur, Hulas in Uttar Pradesh

Post-Urban Harappan Settlement in Swat Valley (Pakistan):

❖ The post-urban Harappan settlements have been discovered in the Swat Valley (Pakistan).

❖ People practiced agriculture and cattle rearing together with pastoralism.

❖ They used black-grey burnished ware produced on a slow wheel.

❖ Swat people also produced black-on-red painted and wheel-turned pottery which shows close links with Indus pottery during the ‘early post-urban’ period.

❖ They show a connection with a post-urban culture associated with Harappa.

❖ Thus, the Swat Valley can be regarded as the northernmost outpost of late-Harappan culture.

Proto-Dentistry

❖ In 2001, archaeologists studying the remains of men from Mehrgarh, Pakistan, discovered that the people of the Indus Valley Civilization, from the early Harappan periods, had knowledge of proto-dentistry.

❖ Later, in April 2006, it was announced in the scientific journal Nature that the oldest (and first early Neolithic) evidence for the drilling of human teeth in vivo (i.e., in a living person) was found in Mehrgarh.

❖ Eleven drilled molar crowns from nine adults were discovered in a Neolithic graveyard in Mehrgarh that dates from 7,500-9,000 years ago→ tradition of proto-dentistry in the early farming cultures’Interrogating Indus inscription to unravel their mechanism of meaning conveyance’ [Research paper]:❖ The Indus inscriptions can be compared to the structured messages found on stamps, coupons, tokens and currency coins of modern times.

Major findings:

➢ The majority of the Indus Valley inscriptions were written logo graphically (by using word signs) and not by using phonograms (speech sounds units), claims a recent research paper published in Palgrave Communications, a Nature group journal.

➢ The paper mainly focuses on understanding how Indus inscriptions conveyed meanings, rather than on deciphering what they conveyed. The inscribed seals and tablets were used in some administrative operation that controlled the commercial transactions of the ancient Indus Valley Civilisation.

➢ According to the paper, though many ancient scripts use rebus methods to generate new words, the inscriptions found on the Indus seals and tablets have not used rebus as the mechanism to convey meaning.

➢ The researcher also rejected the popular hypothesis that the seals were inscribed with Proto-Dravidian or Proto-Indo-European names of the seal-owners.

Here you will get a complete notes for your UPSC Civil Services Examination.

PALAEOLITHIC AGE

MESOLITHIC AGE

NEOLITHIC AGE

CHALCOLITHIC AGE

HUMAN EVOLUTION

Contact Us for Full Guidance And Complete Notes

WhatsApp

Facebook

Instagram

For further detailed information visit/click repidia.com

Leave a comment